Skip to main content
💰 No Save, No Pay — We defend your audit. You keep 75% of every dollar saved. Zero risk. How it works →
Software Audit Defence
Avg exposure reduction: 60–80%

Software Audit Defence — Reduce Vendor Claims 60–80%

✓ NO SAVE, NO PAY — 25% gainshare only

Oracle's LMS team. Microsoft's SAM team. SAP's STAR auditors. IBM's license compliance team. Every one of these organisations uses audits as a revenue generation tool — not a compliance exercise. Vendors initiate 90% of enterprise audits because they expect a settlement. We ensure that settlement is on your terms, not theirs.

Get Immediate Audit Support → See How Our Gainshare Works
60–80%
Average reduction in initial audit claim
$200M+
Audit exposure resolved for clients
25%
Our fee — only from verified savings vs. claim
48h
Response time on urgent audit notices

⚠️ Just Received an Audit Notice?

Do not respond to the vendor directly. Do not provide access to your SAM tools or infrastructure without independent counsel. The first 72 hours of an audit define the negotiation landscape. Contact us immediately — we respond within 48 hours and can be engaged within days.

Why Audits Happen

Software Audits Are a Revenue Strategy. Treat Them Accordingly.

The average enterprise's initial audit claim is inflated by 60–80% above what the actual licensing shortfall justifies. This is not an accident. Vendors use audit methodology ambiguities, broad interpretation of deployment rules, and aggressive compliance definitions to maximise settlement value. Without independent defence, enterprises routinely pay far more than they owe.

🔍

Oracle LMS Audits

Oracle's License Management Services team runs the most aggressive audit programme in enterprise software. LMS scripts for Database, Java SE Employee Metric, Fusion Middleware, and OCI deployments are designed to find violations. We've seen LMS scripts intentionally scan VMware clusters in ways that maximize processor metrics — even when your contract allows sub-capacity licensing.

🪟

Microsoft SAM Audits

Microsoft's Software Asset Management audit programme focuses on Azure hybrid deployments, M365/E5 over-subscription, and Teams licensing. The audit methodology for SQL Server in virtualised environments and Windows Server active-passive cluster rules catches organisations who relied on outdated compliance guidance. Microsoft typically opens with a claim 2–3x the genuine shortfall.

🏭

SAP STAR Audits

SAP's Software Asset Recovery (STAR) team uses the User Measurement Tool (USMM) and License Audit Workbench (LAW) to identify Digital Access violations and Named User misclassification. SAP's Digital Access model has created enormous compliance ambiguity — many SAP customers are technically non-compliant simply because their integration architecture predates SAP's 2018 licensing model changes.

💻

IBM License Compliance

IBM's license compliance programme focuses on PVU (Processor Value Unit) counting errors, ILMT (IBM License Metric Tool) configuration failures, Cloud Pak consumption, and Sub-Capacity licensing eligibility. IBM's audit methodology for virtualised environments is technically complex — misconfigured ILMT deployments alone can create six-figure compliance claims even when the software is being used entirely legitimately.

⚡

ServiceNow ELA Audits

ServiceNow's compliance reviews increasingly focus on Fulfiller count accuracy, IntegrationHub usage, and custom application deployments built on the Now Platform. As organisations extend ServiceNow beyond ITSM into HR, finance, and legal workflows, the number of employees interacting with ServiceNow-powered processes — even indirectly — can trigger significant unexpected licensing exposure.

🌐

Other Vendor Audits

We defend against audit programmes from all major vendors including Salesforce (API usage and platform access reviews), Broadcom/VMware (VCF per-core deployment audits), Workday, Adobe, Autodesk, and emerging SaaS vendors whose compliance teams are becoming increasingly sophisticated in their audit methodology.

What We Deliver

Audit Defence That Goes Far Beyond Basic Compliance Reconciliation

Zero-Risk Audit Defence

We work on a 25% gainshare basis — our fee is 25% of the reduction we achieve on the vendor's initial audit claim. If we don't reduce the claim, you pay nothing. Get immediate audit support →

Independent Audit Scope Analysis

Before any data leaves your environment, we independently verify the audit scope. Vendors routinely request access far beyond what their contract entitles them to — data about systems that aren't in scope, infrastructure that predates your licensing agreement, or deployment information that could create new compliance obligations. We define the boundaries of what you're required to provide.

Forensic License Reconciliation

We conduct our own independent license position analysis before the vendor does. Understanding your actual compliance position — including all defences, entitlements, and legitimate deployment configurations — before the vendor presents their findings gives you the ability to challenge their methodology from a position of knowledge, not guesswork.

Methodology Challenge

The most powerful audit defence tool is a rigorous challenge to the vendor's counting methodology. Oracle's LMS scripts, SAP's USMM tool, and Microsoft's SAM methodology all contain interpretive assumptions that favour the vendor. We identify every point where the vendor's interpretation of your contract or deployment can be legitimately challenged — and we document those challenges formally.

Negotiated Settlement

When a genuine compliance gap exists, we negotiate the settlement. Vendors have significant discretion in how they resolve audits — credit against future purchases, phased payment, discounted catch-up licensing, or contractual modifications that restructure how you're licensed going forward. We ensure you receive every available concession, not just the one the vendor's audit team first proposes.

Future Audit Protection

Every audit engagement includes a post-resolution hardening phase. We implement or strengthen your Software Asset Management process, document your licensing position, and negotiate contractual protections against future audit re-examination of the same period. An audit resolved once should not become a recurring revenue exercise for the vendor.

Contract Review & Optimization

Audits frequently reveal that your underlying licensing model is unnecessarily complex or expensive for your actual deployment pattern. We use the audit resolution as an opportunity to renegotiate your licensing architecture — moving from metrics that create ongoing compliance risk to simpler, more predictable models that protect you long-term. See our multi-vendor negotiation service for full contract optimization.

Our Audit Defence Process

From Audit Notice to Resolved Claim — A Structured Approach

01

Emergency Response — 48-Hour Engagement

When you receive an audit notice, time is critical. Vendor audit teams have rehearsed scripts for the first call. We engage within 48 hours, brief your team on what not to say, and establish your audit response protocol before any vendor contact. We've intercepted audits at every stage — including after the first response has already been sent.

02

Independent Position Analysis

Before the vendor presents their findings, we conduct our own independent license position analysis. We review your SAM data, deployment records, contract entitlements, and any previous audit settlements. This gives us an accurate baseline against which to challenge the vendor's methodology and findings.

03

Vendor Response Management

We manage all communication with the vendor's audit team. Every data request is reviewed for scope compliance. Every technical claim in the audit report is challenged where appropriate. Formal written objections are filed against methodology errors. The vendor's audit team knows when they're dealing with independent advisors — and it changes the dynamic entirely.

04

Settlement Negotiation

Where a compliance gap exists, we negotiate the settlement terms. We know what settlements are achievable for your vendor and your specific situation — payment structure, credit application, licensing model changes, and contractual protections against future audits. We present you with the full range of available outcomes and the trade-offs of each before you commit.

05

Hardening & Future Protection

Post-resolution, we implement a SAM programme hardening plan and negotiate contract language that protects you in future audit cycles. If your licensing model created the compliance risk in the first place, we restructure it. If your SAM process was inadequate, we fix it. We leave you in a stronger position than you were before the audit started.

Full explanation of how our gainshare model works →
Case Study

Technology Company: Oracle Database Audit — $4.2M Claim Reduced to $380K

A 3,000-person technology company received an Oracle LMS audit notice following their migration to a VMware vSphere environment. Oracle's initial audit claim was $4.2M in back-licensing fees, based on an LMS script that had scanned their entire vSphere cluster and applied full processor metrics to all physical cores across all hosts — regardless of which VMs were actually running Oracle software.

Our analysis identified that the LMS script had been run without proper VM partitioning documentation being provided to Oracle. Under Oracle's Partitioning Policy, correctly documented VM-to-host assignments using hard partitioning or specific VMware configurations can dramatically reduce the processor count. Oracle's auditors had applied the most conservative interpretation — full physical core counting — in the absence of this documentation.

We challenged Oracle's methodology on three grounds: incorrect VM configuration data used in the LMS analysis, failure to account for the client's BYOL entitlements from a prior acquisition, and misclassification of four Oracle Database instances as Standard Edition when they qualified as Standard Edition 2 under the deployment configuration. After 120 days of structured negotiation, the claim was settled at $380K — a 91% reduction from Oracle's opening position.

Results at a Glance
91%
Claim reduction
$3.8M
Avoided payment
3
Methodology challenges filed
120d
Engagement to resolution
"We were convinced we were going to pay $4M. We had no idea the LMS methodology was challengeable — our own SAM team thought Oracle's numbers were right. They weren't."
— CIO, Mid-Market Technology Company (identity withheld per NDA)
Read the full case study →
Vendor Coverage

We Defend Audits From Every Major Software Vendor

Our team includes former members of Oracle LMS, Microsoft SAM, SAP STAR, and IBM License Compliance — the exact teams that conduct these audits. We know the playbook because we used to run it.

Oracle (LMS/Java) Microsoft (SAM) SAP (STAR/LAW) IBM (ILMT/PVU) ServiceNow Broadcom/VMware Salesforce Adobe Autodesk + 40 others
Related Services

Audit Defence is Just the Start

Oracle

Oracle Contract Negotiation

Reduce Oracle EA, ULA, and cloud costs. Renegotiate after an audit to ensure you're not over-licensed going forward.

→
Multi-Vendor

Multi-Vendor Negotiation

Use your audit resolution as a catalyst to restructure your entire software estate. One firm, every vendor, maximum leverage.

→
SaaS

SaaS Contract Negotiation

Reduce SaaS costs across your entire stack. Right-size licences, challenge auto-renewals, and build in price protections.

→

Free White Paper: Software Audit Defence Manual

50 pages covering Oracle LMS, Microsoft SAM, SAP STAR, and IBM audit methodology — and how to challenge each one. Written by former members of vendor audit teams.

Download Free Guide →
FAQ

Software Audit Defence — Common Questions

We already responded to the vendor's first audit notice. Is it too late to engage you?

No — it's never too late. Even if you've already submitted initial data to the vendor's audit team, we can still challenge the methodology, dispute findings, and negotiate the settlement. The most important interventions are: before you provide additional data requests, before you receive the vendor's formal findings report, and before you sign a settlement agreement. Each of these is a distinct opportunity to reduce your exposure significantly.

How does the gainshare model work for audit defence?

Our fee for audit defence is 25% of the reduction we achieve versus the vendor's initial audit claim. If Oracle claims $4M and we resolve the audit at $800K, our fee is 25% of the $3.2M reduction — $800K. You pay $800K to Oracle and $800K to us. Your net position versus paying the original claim: you're $2.4M better off. If we don't reduce the claim, you owe us nothing. This model means we are motivated to challenge every dollar of the vendor's claim — because our fee depends on it.

What if we are actually non-compliant? Can you still help?

Absolutely. In most audits we've resolved, there is a genuine compliance gap — but the vendor's initial claim significantly overstates its value. Regardless of whether you're truly non-compliant, you have the right to challenge the methodology, the scope, the metric interpretation, and the settlement structure. Even when we can't eliminate the compliance gap entirely, we routinely achieve 40–70% reductions in what our clients pay to resolve genuinely non-compliant positions.

Can you help us prepare proactively before an audit arrives?

Yes — and this is often more cost-effective than responding to an audit. Our proactive SAM assessment identifies your current compliance position across key vendors, documents your licensing entitlements, and implements process improvements that reduce future audit risk. We also negotiate contract protections that limit a vendor's audit rights or require advance notice before an audit can be initiated. See our multi-vendor negotiation service for full proactive contract management.

Do you work alongside our legal team or replace them?

We work alongside your legal team. Our expertise is technical — licensing metrics, deployment methodology, SAM data analysis, and vendor negotiation. Your legal team handles contractual interpretation and any formal legal proceedings if required. In practice, most audit settlements are resolved commercially before legal proceedings become relevant. We coordinate closely with in-house counsel and external legal advisors on every engagement.

Act Now — Before It's Too Late

Don't Negotiate Your Own Audit. We Do It For You — At No Upfront Cost.

Whether you've just received an audit notice or you've been in the vendor's audit process for months, we can help. Contact us today for a confidential assessment of your position and your options.

Get Immediate Audit Support → View All Services

48-hour response · 25% gainshare · No upfront cost · Zero risk

Related Reading

Expert Guides on Software Audit Defence

→ Software Audit Defence Strategies → Oracle Audit Defence Playbook → IBM ILMT Audit Risks → SAP Indirect Access Explained → Microsoft License Compliance Guide
Negotiation Intelligence

Get vendor tactics delivered to your inbox

Renewal playbooks, pricing benchmarks, audit risk alerts, and contract term analysis. What vendors don't want you to know — sent to enterprise procurement and IT leaders every week.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time. Corporate emails only.